2026 World Cup: The US Could be Stripped of Hosting Due to FIFA Rules
Force majeure is defined as 'a contractual clause that frees parties from liability or obligation when an extraordinary, uncontrollable event—such as a war, strike, riot, crime, or "act of God" (natural disaster) - prevents them from fulfilling contract terms'. According to the 2026 World Cup rulebook, FIFA have the right to 'cancel, reschedule or relocate one or more matches (or the entire FIFA World Cup 26) for any reason at its sole discretion, including as a result of force majeure or due to health, safety or security concerns.' Due to a contract clause, it's possible they could lose those rights if FIFA deem the situation to be serious enough. Not only were there conversations around potential boycotts, but a group of United Kingdom MPs called for the US to be kicked out of the World Cup, which they are set to host alongside Canada and Mexico. Critics, including former FIFA president Sepp Blatter, have urged fans to “stay away” from US matches, citing safety risks and authoritarian tendencies. This stems from a combination of political controversies under the Trump administration and a specific provision in FIFA’s hosting regulations that grants the organization significant discretion over the event. The 2026 FIFA World Cup, set to take place across the United States, Canada, and Mexico from June to July 2026, faces growing speculation about whether the US could be stripped of its primary hosting role.
- The spotlight is on the United States as tensions continue to rise over immigration enforcement operations.
- For many globe-trotting soccer fans, the chickens have now come home to roost.
- Yareliz Méndez, policy coordinator at the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), was emphatic in calling on Miami’s local government to end any cooperation with immigration authorities in the context of sporting events.
- The US Department of Homeland Security has previously stated the purpose of ICE agents at the 2026 Olympics is to "vet and mitigate risks from transnational criminal organisations" as well provide security for US officials.
- But as we’ve seen recently, the treatment of people as they are entering this country has borne more resemblance to airports in Tel Aviv or Pinochet’s Chile than those in a democratic country.
- “Cancel, reschedule or relocate one or more matches (or the entire FIFA World Cup 26) for any reason at its sole discretion, including as a result of force majeure or due to health, safety or security concerns.”
- It’s no wonder that Canada, alongside numerous European countries, have issued travel advisories for the United States.
Syria One Year After Assad’s Fall: Sharaa’s Authority Amid Security Collapse
For them, ensuring that immigrant communities can participate without fear is not just a moral imperative—it’s a condition for the success and integrity of the tournament itself. As preparations continue for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, rights advocates are sounding the alarm. “This World Cup must not become a place of fear and detention,” said Paul Christian Namphy of Family Action Network Movement (FANM). Attorney Will Mann of the Community Justice Project warned that the 287(g) program turns local law enforcement into extensions of ICE. “These programs are causing chaos, fear, and uncertainty across our communities,” she added. During a press conference held outside FIFA’s offices in Miami, spokespersons for several non-governmental organizations demanded guarantees of an environment free from immigration enforcement operations during the tournament. Activists are pressuring FIFA to ensure the 2026 World Cup remains free from immigration enforcement operations that could intimidate immigrant fans Despite this, it is unlikely that this will happen, given the US’s influence in international sports and the fact that it is a co-host country. FIFA could have the ability to revoke the United States of its hosting rights for the 2026 FIFA World Cup if a little-known contract clause is invoked. The activists directly urged FIFA to take a stand on these concerns, arguing that its international reputation is at stake. A general exterior view of the signage at Levi's Stadium, host venue for the FIFA World Cup 2026 The situation underscores the intersection of geopolitics and global sport, where FIFA’s contractual flexibility could become a focal point if tensions escalate further. Shifting games to Canada or Mexico would disrupt logistics, scheduling, and preparations.FIFA Contract Clause Could Scupper Plans for ICE at World Cup
We want a World Cup without fear, without raids, and without violations of human rights,” Méndez stated. “Fans come to watch soccer stars, not to run into ‘Alligator Alcatraz,’” declared one spokesperson, making an ironic reference to the immigration detention center in the Everglades, which remains heavily criticized by human rights groups. No official FIFA action has been taken to alter US hosting as of early February 2026. The US hosts the majority of matches (including the final) across 11 cities, with massive economic stakes—billions in revenue for FIFA, cities, and sponsors.- Despite this, it is unlikely that this will happen, given the US’s influence in international sports and the fact that it is a co-host country.
- They warned that the presence of immigration enforcement at stadiums would turn the atmosphere of the tournament into one of surveillance and fear.
- The price for wanting to visit the US has meant having your electronics searched, your politics interrogated, or getting strip-searched and left naked in a back room at Logan Airport.
- For them, ensuring that immigrant communities can participate without fear is not just a moral imperative—it’s a condition for the success and integrity of the tournament itself.
- “It is unlikely that FIFA — the organization that awarded its first global peace prize to Trump — would strip the US of its hosting rights.
